Firefox turns 7 releasing Firefox 8

fred
0
1st December

Firefox Cake

Firefox, the world’s second most widely used internet browser turned seven recently coinciding with the its latest release of Firefox 8 on the 8th of September.

According to the Firefox homepage this latest addition is more than 32 times faster than the original Firefox 1.0.

Firefox 8 comes just six weeks after its predecessor Firefox 7. Since the release of Version 5.0 on the 21st of June 2011. Firefox has released subsequent versions every six weeks as part of its rapid release strategy focusing chiefly on speed, stability and security.

The major changes to Firefox 8 are that users can now disable or enable add-ons easily upon installation. Additionally user installed add-ons are enabled by default and third party program add-ons are disabled by default. The benefits of this change are many. It is planned to reduce interface clutter from unused toolbar options, speed up start-up and page loading time, give the user greater control and increase net security.

Other features of Firefox 8 include stability fixes with 8 patches, an on-demand tab which loads at startup reducing restored session load time. Perhaps Firefox 8’s most toted improvement is the new Twitter search bar enabling users to look up topics, hashtags and usernames in the search bar.

The next version of Firefox is due for release on the 20th of December 2011.

Google and Verizon provide an ‘Open Internet’ proposal!

Nick
0
31st August

Open SignEarlier this month Google and Verizon posted their collaborative proposal for an open Internet. The two major players have put their differences aside to collaborate again for the greater good. The proposal comes in response to a recent court ruling asserting that the FCC lacks the authority to impose net neutrality, something that Google and Verizon had been pushing along with several other corporate bodies.

In a nutshell, the new proposal is somewhat more of a compromise trying to achieve some desirable outcome for all parties involved. Firstly, both firms still believe that web users are entitled to choose what content, applications, or devices they consume on the Internet. Secondly, both firms want enforceable probation against discriminatory practices such as prioritisation (including paid prioritisation) and the blocking of Internet traffic. Thirdly, both Google and Verizon agreed that fewer restrictions within the wireless Internet space would be necessary with concerns that any ‘red tape’ could hinder this competitive environment, for the time being at least.

Keen to shift some of the authority back to the FCC, the proposal also states that, if passed into law, ISPs would be held accountable for breaking any of the ‘open Internet’ stipulations to the tune of up to $2 million. This means that the FCC would play a more regulatory role with the ability to fine “bad actors”, as the proposal puts it, for playing up. It’s also not a surprise to see that both Google and Verizon expressed their avid support for the National Broadband Plan to replace the existing assortment of network infrastructure. The questions is – with the latest election leaving everyone up in the air just how sweet a deal will the National Broadband Plan be for our industry?

Australia web filter plans slammed

Simon
0
25th March

Internet giant Google led high-profile criticism of Australia’s controversial plan to filter the Internet Tuesday, saying it went too far and could set a dangerous precedent.

Currently locked in a major dispute over censorship in China, the US web giant said its primary concern with Australia’s proposal was “that the scope of content to be filtered is too wide”.

Google said Australia went “well beyond” filters being considered in countries such as Britain, Canada, Denmark, Finland and Sweden, which focus only on blocking material related to child sex abuse.

Such a sweeping mandatory regime risked damage to Australia’s reputation, it said, adding in a veiled reference to autocratic countries such as China that it could “confer legitimacy upon filtering by other governments”.

“Australia is rightly regarded as a liberal democracy that balances individual liberty with social responsibility,” Google said, in a submission to Australia’s government.

“The scope of content to be filtered is too wide.” Google

“The governments of many other countries may justify, by reference to Australia, their use of filtering, their lack of disclosure about what is being filtered, and their political direction of agencies administering filtering.”

Canberra in December announced an ambitious plan to block access to sites featuring material such as rape, drug use, bestiality and child sex abuse with an Internet-wide content filter administered by service providers.

Google said such a “massive undertaking” would limit network speeds, and that filtering material from popular sites such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter appeared to “not be technologically possible”.

Filtering could also give a false sense of security to parents and was easily circumvented, the company said.

We would love to here your thoughts on Australia’s filter plan.

EFAPetitionElectronic Frontiers Australia is coordinating a petition against the Government’s mandatory Internet filtering policy that will be presented to the Senate of the Parliament of Australia. What are you waiting for? Help save the internet for all Australian.